I THOROUGHLY enjoyed the article by Peter Ackerman and Jack DuVall ("With Weapons of the Will," September-October 2002).
Letters
Glenn K. Smith 5-01-2003
IN THE March-April 2003 issue, there were many compelling arguments against the war in Iraq.
John E. Hill 5-01-2003
WILLIAM H. GATES Sr. and Chuck Collins are clear and persuasive in their January-February article "Tax the Rich?"
Michael J. Gorman 5-01-2003
I STRONGLY agree with Gerald Schlabach's commentary ("We Pledge Allegiance...") on allegiance and the issue of loyalty—will it be to Jesus or to some political figure?
Mark Davis 3-01-2003
"THE BOMB is Back" (by Jonathan Schell, November-December 2002) recommends the prohibition of nuclear arms to prevent nuclear war.
Harriet Warnock-Graham 3-01-2003
I was moved by Josh Healey's concern for the human rights of Palestinians ("Not in My Name"). It's encouraging to see young people committed to justice.
Ron Stivers 3-01-2003
IN "NOT IN MY NAME" (January-February 2003), Josh Healey states, "I must first recognize that the root of the conflict—the occupation—is being perpetrated by the Israeli government."
Richard Deats 3-01-2003
Peter Ackerman and Jack DuVall have done an excellent job in clearly demonstrating the power of strategic nonviolent action in overthrowing oppressive regimes such as that of Saddam Hussein.
Celia Davis 1-01-2003
IT IS ASSUMED that a magazine like yours aims to develop the spiritual gift of discernment.
Jill Johnson-Danielson 1-01-2003
QUOTES IN "Where the Boys Aren't" (by Holly Lebowitz Rossi, November-December 2002) by Rev.
John Foreman 1-01-2003
JIM WALLIS, in arguing for disarming Iraq without war says, "But the incentive should be a gradual lifting of sanctions and a pledge of no military attack if Iraq really cooperates."
Col. Thomas W. McGuire 1-01-2003
"The Bomb is Back" is an excellent article and absolutely on target, especially your idea that attacking Iraq is going to produce the opposite effect of stated U.S. policy objectives.
Thomas Lawrence 1-01-2003
WHILE I AGREE with Peter Ackerman and Jack DuVall ("With Weapons of the Will," September-October 2002) that nonviolent action by Iraqis would be the best approach...
Anne Haehl 11-01-2002
The thoughtful and tough-minded article on nonviolent resistance by Peter Ackerman and Jack DuVall was excellent. I liked all of it—except the first paragraph.
Tom Sine 11-01-2002
David Batstone decries political and theological imagination in "Utopia: No Garden of Eden" (July-August 2002).
Name withheld by request 11-01-2002
Much grace and gratitude to you and Richard Rohr for "Beyond Crime and Punishment" (July-August 2002).
John Reuwar 11-01-2002
Thank you for the unmuddled thinking in Peter Ackerman and Jack DuVall's article on how to defeat Saddam Hussein without a violent war ("With Weapons of the Will," September-October 2002).
R. Marro 11-01-2002
"Why Not Attack Iraq?" was thoughtful and well written; however, if we had taken that attitude towards Hitler, most of Europe would be eating wiener schnitzel.