Commentary

Marcus Raskin 3-01-1999
What does Augusto Pinochet have to teach us?
Gordon Cosby 1-01-1999
Remembering Elizabeth O'Connor.

The brutal and tragic killing of Matthew Shepard last fall makes it clear that Christians need a more mature response to the issue of homosexuality in general, and gay-bashing in particular.

Julie Polter 1-01-1999
Taking back the airwaves for free speech and local issues.
Marvin Rees 1-01-1999
Real disaster relief requires more then 'Good Samaritan' acts.
Kristin Brennan 1-01-1999
The corporatization of higher education.
Rose Marie Berger 1-01-1999
Orthodox reformers forge path of peace.
Tony P. Hall 11-01-1998
The systematic cruelty behind Sudan's suffering.
Oliver Thomas 11-01-1998
How to fix public education.
Mike Jendrzejczyk 11-01-1998
Moral authority and human rights.
Jim Wallis 11-01-1998

The U.S. government is telling us that we have entered a new war, one that may last for years, even decades. If that is so, we are beginning with the wrong strategy.

Robert Jewett 11-01-1998
A biblical reflection on public lies.
Julie Polter 11-01-1998
Advent, incarnation, and the daily news.
Sadly, kids killing kids isn't anything new.
Marie Smyth 9-01-1998
Northern Ireland lurches toward peace.
Gordon Bonnyman 9-01-1998
The HMO system cries out for reform.
Duane Shank 9-01-1998
Power politics vs. the poor
Judith Gundry-Volf 9-01-1998

Southern Baptists and the subordination of women

Julie Polter 9-01-1998

This morning's Washington Post said it is a "workers' market." A booming U.S.

Duane Shank 7-01-1998

The post-Cold War dream of a world free from nuclear weapons had a rude awakening this May. India’s five nuclear tests and Pakistan’s even more provocative response are a major setback to nuclear non-proliferation and threaten a dangerous arms race in South Asia, one of the world’s most likely nuclear flash points.

Pakistan’s deployment of nuclear warheads on its long-range Ghauri missiles makes an already deteriorating situation even more dangerous. Both India and Pakistan have been suspected for decades of having nuclear capability. This spring’s tests removed any doubt and will accelerate the arms race between the two—and could make a future nuclear exchange a real possibility. China is unlikely to sit idly by and may now increase its nuclear arsenal targeted at India.

After 24 years of ambiguity, why did India risk a regional arms race, international condemnation, and sanctions by testing nuclear weapons? There are several immediate reasons.

Geopolitics. In the past 50 years, India and Pakistan have fought three wars over Kashmir, and since India’s 1962 war with China the country has lived in fear of further attacks. In recent years, the Clinton administration has allowed China to acquire previously forbidden military, nuclear, supercomputer, and satellite technology, which China allegedly then made available to Pakistan. Only one month before India’s test, Pakistan for the first time successfully tested a ballistic missile capable of reaching India’s major cities. India has increasingly felt the regional balance changing to its detriment.