Skip to main content
Sojourners
faith in action for social justice
Sojourners
About
About SojournersEventsOur TeamWork With UsMediaWays to GiveInvite a SpeakerContact Us
SojoAction
OverviewTake ActionIssue AreasResourcesFaith-Rooted AdvocatesChurch Engagement
Magazine
Current IssueArchivesManage My SubscriptionWrite for Sojourners
Sections
LatestPoliticsColumnsLiving FaithArts & CultureGlobalPodcastsVideoPreaching The Word
Subscribe
MagazineRenewPreaching the WordCustomer ServiceNewsletters
Donate
Login / Register

Supreme Court Weighs a Church’s Right to Advertise Services

By Lauren Markoe, Religion News Service
Photo via Lauren Markoe / RNS
Pastor Clyde Reed of Good News Community Church, center, with his wife Ann. Photo via Lauren Markoe / RNS
Jan 12, 2015
Share

The Supreme Court on Jan. 12 considered a tiny church’s curbside sign in a case that could raise the bar on government regulation of speech, and make it easier for houses of worship to advertise their services.

The Alliance Defending Freedom, the nonprofit advocacy group that represents Pastor Clyde Reed and his Good News Community Church, bills the case, Reed v. Town of Gilbert, as a religious rights case. But their attorney mostly argued it on free speech grounds.

“The town code discriminates on its face by treating certain signs differently based solely on what they said,” attorney David A. Cortman told the justices. “The treatment we’re seeking is merely equal treatment under the First Amendment.”

The town of Gilbert, Ariz., outside Phoenix, allows political signs to be much larger and permits them to stay up much longer, Cortman said.

Chief Justice John Roberts noted that Cortman’s case did not rely on the religious nature of the plaintiff.

“Your argument does not turn on the fact that it’s a church’s sign, does it?” asked Roberts. “Your argument would be the same if this is a temporary sign about where the soccer game was going to be?”

“That’s right,” Cortman answered.

With no more than 30 congregants, Good News Community Church has no permanent home. Each week, members planted so-called temporary directional signs — the kind intended to guide people to a concert or school picnic — to help people find the church, since its location often changed.

The congregation brought suit against the town seven years ago after receiving multiple citations for failing to take its signs down within an hour, as town rules require. But the church said the same rules didn’t apply to political signs, or homebuilders who erected signs to entice people to look at their new houses.

“This is a speech case, not a religious rights case,” said Ira Lupu, a law professor emeritus at George Washington University, who has followed the case. “The issues would be the same if the plaintiff were the operator of a weekly meeting by a secular nonprofit group to discuss books or social problems.”

Gilbert officials have repeatedly prevailed in the lower courts by invoking their rights to regulate so-called temporary directional signage. Towns and cities enforce such regulations all over the country — restricting how big these signs can be, where they can be placed, and when they must be uprooted.

Philip W. Savrin, who argued Jan. 12 for the town, said municipalities have a right to control litter and clutter on their roadsides, and said the rules on temporary directional signs apply equally to church, events, barbecues and soccer games.

“It is not something that is based on either the message that is being conveyed or the viewpoint,” he said after the justices heard the case. “It has to do with the function of the sign, which is to guide travelers on their route to their destination.”

But several justices had a hard time with that argument, questioning whether a church’s temporary sign was just about direction, or could relay messages that might put it into a different category of sign: a sign expressing an ideology or belief, for example, that would receive more favorable treatment under municipal sign laws.

Justice Samuel Alito drew laughter from the courtroom when he suggested that Gilbert’s sign ordinances created artificial categories, in which a directional sign could only be about direction, or arrows pointing the way.

“So they could put up a quote-unquote ideological sign that says, ‘Come to our service on Sunday morning,’ but no arrow, and then they put up another sign that says, ‘this is the arrow?'” Alito asked of Savrin.

If the sign gives directions, Savrin responded, then it has to follow the rules on directional signs. “The sign could say, your honor, where it is taking place, but if it is intending to guide travelers to that location, then it would need to comply with — with the provisions.”

After arguments, Reed, 82, spoke on the steps of the Supreme Court in a heavy rain, saying that he never imagined that his little church would wage a seven-year legal battle that would wind up at the highest court in the land.

“Our town treats church signs differently than other types of signs,” Reed said. “Our signs inviting people to church are very important, yet are considered second-class speech.”

The justices are expected to issue their decision next spring.

Lauren Markoe covered government and features as a daily newspaper reporter for 15 years before joining the Religion News Service staff as a national correspondent in 2011. Via RNS.

Got something to say about what you're reading? We value your feedback!

Tell Us What You Think!

We value your feedback on the articles we post. Please fill out the form below, and a member of our online publication team will receive your message. By submitting this form, you consent to your comment being featured in our Letters section. 

Please do not include any non-text characters, such as emojis or other non-standard content, into your submission.  It may cause errors in submitting the form.  Thanks!

Don't Miss a Story!

Sojourners is committed to faith and justice even in polarized times. Will you join us on the journey?
Confirm Your Email Address.
By entering your email we'll send you our newsletter each Thursday. You can unsubscribe anytime.
Pastor Clyde Reed of Good News Community Church, center, with his wife Ann. Photo via Lauren Markoe / RNS
Search Sojourners

Subscribe

Magazine Newsletters Preaching The Word
Follow on Facebook Follow on Bluesky Follow on Instagram Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Sojourners
Donate Products Editorial Policies Privacy Policy

Media

Advertising Press

Opportunities

Careers Fellowship Program

Contact

Office
408 C St. NE
Washington DC, 20002
Phone 202-328-8842
Fax 202-328-8757
Email sojourners@sojo.net
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2025