Religious Groups Mixed Over Guantánamo Closure Plan

By Aysha Khan 2-24-2016
Image via REUTERS/RNS

After years of activism and campaigns, religious groups have mixed reactions to the White House’s proposed closure of the Guantánamo Bay military prison.

The blueprint for closure, submitted to Congress on Feb. 23 for review, would establish a U.S. location for detainees currently held at the detention facility located at the U.S. naval base in Cuba.

Groups in favor of the prison’s closure say the measure is not enough, since remaining detainees may continue to be held indefinitely without either charge or trial.

“We welcome the closure, but we’re still very concerned about the prospect of indefinite detention,” Robert McCaw, of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, told RNS.

“We’re just importing Guantánamo and its legal framework to American shores. While the prison would be gone, the prisoners would still be a symbol of America’s lack of due process.”

Under the proposal, which would fulfill President Barack Obama’s campaign promise made seven years ago, the defense department would transfer 35 detainees to foreign countries and review remaining detainees to see if their detention is necessary.

“The president’s goal of transferring or trying almost all of the detainees can only improve our moral standing in the world,” the Rev. Ron Stief of the National Religious Campaign Against Torture said in a statement.

“However, an important flaw in the President’s plan is that it is immoral and contrary to American values for the U.S. to hold anyone without the reasonable prospect of a trial.”

The NRCAT has rallied more than 300 faith-based organizations to campaign against the detention facility. In January, the group protested the prison’s 14th anniversary in front of the White House; in 2013, members held a 24-hour fast alongside various clergy members and collected signatures from more than 40 religious leaders to push Obama for closure.

The American Center for Law and Justice, a Christian-based social activist group founded by televangelist Pat Robertson, said the move will harm the nation’s security.

“The announcement by President Obama underscores the blatant political nature of this president during his two terms in office,” said ACLJ chief counsel Jay Sekulow.

“Closing GITMO not only places America in grave danger, it bootstraps the next president — continuing a foreign policy that is dangerous to America.”

Rabbi Shmuly Yanklowitz, who leads the Orthodox social justice organization Uri L’Tzedek in Arizona, commended Obama’s proposal.

“Rather than being a symbol of strength, Guantánamo has made us all less safe,” Yanklowitz told RNS in an email.

“Judaism rejects the cruel tactics of torture, even for those suspected of the worst crimes … the religious community must not be silent when it comes to promoting human rights for all.”

He said moving the prisoners to the mainland would be a step closer to due process for them, citing the passage in Psalms 102:21 that it should be possible “to hear the groaning of the prisoner.”

Via Religion News Service.

Aysha Khan reports for RNS.

Don't Miss a Story!

Get Sojourners delivered straight to your inbox.

Have Something to Say?

Add or Read Comments on
"Religious Groups Mixed Over Guantánamo Closure Plan"
Launch Comments
By commenting here, I agree to abide by the Sojourners Comment Community Covenant guidelines and acknowledge that my comment may be published in the Letters to the Editor section of Sojourners magazine.

Must Reads

Subscribe