Among the many sad notes that have been played in regard to the Catholic Church's sexual abuse scandal, here's one that points to the depth of the church's disgrace: Various media outlets reported that, "prompted by the scandal," dioceses across the country announced the firing of dozens of priests.
Why did it take a "scandal" elsewhere to prompt these actions? What's the message here? Church officials knew these priests engaged in sexual abuse, yet they didn't act until forced to by the scandalor, more accurately, by the massive publicity around abuse cases in Boston and elsewhere.
Bad as the individual cases are, and as seriously damaged as are many of the individual victims, the far greater sin rests on the actions of the institutional church. As they used to say in the Nixon era, it's not just the crime, it's the cover-up. In this case, the Catholic Church's cover-up had horrendous consequences: Priests often were transferred to situations where they continued to be in contact with childrenand, often, continued to engage in their criminal and destructive behavior.
Church leadersincluding, admittedly, Cardinal Law of Bostonwere fully aware of the crimes committed under their watch, and were consciously engaged in shuffling the abusers from parish to parish. In any jurisdiction in the country, aiding and abetting a felony is a crime, subject to prosecution, trial, and imprisonment. In these cases, you could probably throw in harboring felons and obstruction of justice as well.
What would happen to the principal of an elementary school who similarly covered-up sexual abuse by a teacher and moved the perpetrator from classroom to classroom? Or a corporate CEO with that kind of after-the-fact abetting of criminal behavior? It's safe to assume that people would not merely call for resignation, but criminal prosecution.