The Common Good
September/October 2006

Art or Propaganda?

by Betty Spackman | September/October 2006

The difference between messaging the truth - and being messengers of the truth.

Faith, according to scripture, is “the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen” (Hebrews 11:1). Images of faith, then, are a kind of oxymoron that has been a conundrum to the church for centuries. What happens when the substance of things seen attempts to express the “substance of things hoped for”? Why is it that so much of the imagery used to express Christian faith can be considered “kitsch”? Why is such profound meaning visualized in such feeble ways?

Most writings on the subject, and most dictionaries, define kitsch as any form of popular art or entertainment that is a sentimental, cheaply made trivialization of something else. It is seen as a kind of pseudo-art that borrows from original ideas or copies them directly. I am not convinced that the “original” is as sacred (or even as real) a thing as most of these accounts imply; nevertheless, reproduction—the means by which kitsch objects proliferate—is the antithesis of the creation of an original, which we have generally come to accept as a criterion of fine art and crucial to the notion of the artist as genius and author of the unique.

I see kitsch, as defined by art theory and my own experience, to be both a frivolous and a dangerous thing—a plastic flower with razor-sharp edges or a Kewpie-doll-shaped grenade—which I handle with much care. However, I have also found that some of the most unassuming, unpretentious artifacts that are disregarded by the official domains of fine art and religion have profound influence on some people, going to the very core of their deepest beliefs and most personal passions. For this reason, these so-called artistically weak objects, these culturally poor works of art, demand my attention, begging questions about the relationships between consumerism and desire, art and faith, accessibility and elitism. How do I, as a professional artist and a Christian, reconcile (or not) the continuing consumption of things my aesthetic taste and my personal faith reject at so many levels? What power do these images have? Are they just harmless cultural curios or are they insidious spiritual toxins that can, as C.S. Lewis says, poison the heart?

Betty Spackman is an artist based in British Columbia, Canada. Excerpted from A Profound Weakness: Christians and Kitsch, by Betty Spackman. Copyright 2005. Piquant Editions Ltd.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

Related Stories

Like what you're reading? Get Sojourners E-Mail updates!

Sojourners Comment Community Covenant

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree, even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)