The Common Good

Federal Court Says Accused Abusive Priest Didn’t Work for the Vatican

PORTLAND, Ore. — A federal judge on Monday dismissed the Vatican from a lawsuit filed by a former Portland teenager who says he was sexually abused by a pedophile priest who was transferred from Ireland to Chicago and then Portland in an alleged church effort to hide his past.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Circle of Protection for a Moral Budget

A pledge by church leaders from diverse theological and political beliefs who have come together to form a Circle of Protection around programs that serve the most vulnerable in our nation and around the world.

U.S. District Judge Michael Mosman of Portland said the Vatican didn't employ the Rev. Andrew Ronan, who — according to the lawsuit — molested the teenager in 1965 and 1966. Mosman's ruling means the Vatican can't be held financially liable for the abuse.

"It's clearly a disappointment, but we're definitely not discouraged," said Jeff Anderson, the Minnesota attorney who is representing the victim, listed in the suit as John V. Doe.

His client will appeal Mosman's decision to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, he said.

Jeffrey Lena, a Berkeley, Calif., attorney for the Vatican, described the ruling as "quite significant ... because the Holy See has patiently and cooperatively worked with the American judicial process to arrive at this day."

Not at issue Monday was the remaining defendant. Doe's lawsuit is still active against Ronan's religious order. Other defendants, including the archdioceses in Portland and Chicago, were dismissed years ago.

Doe filed his case in 2002, one of the first in the U.S. to sue the Vatican for sexual abuse by clergy, and it encouraged a spurt of other suits that since have been dismissed.

In 2005, the 9th Circuit ruled that the case could go forward despite arguments that the Vatican couldn't be sued in U.S. court under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

But his contention that the Vatican was Ronan's employer suffered a deep blow with Monday's ruling. Specifically, the judge looked at the facts of the case, which included thousands of pages of legal briefs and exhibits, before determining that the Vatican didn't employ or control Ronan.

Ronan molested children in Ireland and then in Chicago, Anderson said. He was transferred to Portland and given the opportunity to abuse children again — all the while, the abuse was kept secret from parishioners, police and prosecutors to avoid scandal, he said.

"We believe all of the responsibility lies with the Vatican," he said.

Ronan died in 1992. He stepped down from his position as priest in 1966 shortly after the Portland archdiocese began a proceeding against him, and the Vatican approved the departure, returning him to lay status.

According to court papers filed by Lena, the Vatican's attorney, the Vatican learned of the accusations against Ronan only after Doe's alleged abuse in Portland — when he asked to leave the priesthood.

In a letter dated Feb. 14, 1966, Ronan explained why he was leaving: "The reasons for my request are based on my repeated, admitted, documented, homosexual tendencies and acts against the vow of chasity (sic) and celebacy (sic) of the priesthood."

Despite arguments from the Vatican, Doe's attorney said that the Vatican's secrecy over its past of transferring priests who also were child molesters continues.

"While they've given lip service, the same protocols remain in place on top," Anderson said. "Until those at the top are held accountable, the crimes of cover-up will continue."

Aimee Green writes for The Oregonian in Portland, Ore. Via RNS.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

Related Stories


Like what you're reading? Get Sojourners E-Mail updates!

Sojourners Comment Community Covenant

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree, even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)