The Common Good

Bishops ‘Dubious’ on White House Contraception Compromise

The nation's Catholic bishops have again voiced doubts about the Obama administration's plans to modify a mandate for employers to provide free birth control coverage, vowing to press a new campaign to rally Americans to defend religious freedom.

President Barack Obama announcing original compromise in February.(JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)

Related Reading

Despite their skepticism, a statement issued Wednesday (March 14) by leading bishops at the end of a closed-door meeting in Washington was notable for lacking the "war on religion" rhetoric that has characterized many of the hierarchy's broadsides against the White House.

While the bishops called the proposal unveiled by President Obama on Feb. 10 "an unspecified and dubious future 'accommodation,'" they also stressed that they are willing to "accept any invitation to dialogue" with the White House.

The Rev. Thomas Reese, a Jesuit at Georgetown University who follows the inner workings of the hierarchy, described the language as "strong and uncompromising" but not "inflammatory."

"There is no talk of the Obama administration waging a war on religion or being anti-Catholic," Reese said. "There is no talk of civil disobedience or canceling health insurance for their employees if they do not get their way."

The White House is currently in talks with an array of religious leaders -- many of them Catholic officials from hospitals, universities and social service agencies -- on how to structure an acceptable compromise.

The linchpin of Obama's accommodation is to have insurance companies, rather than religious employers, cover the costs of contraception coverage in separate deals with employees that do not involve faith-based organizations.

Staffers from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops who were involved in initial talks ended negotiations because they felt the administration was not dealing fairly with them, a charge the administration rejects.

Tensions over the contraception mandate have escalated divisions between the administration and the Catholic bishops, and led to speculation that the two-day meeting of the USCCB's Administrative Committee would look for ways to soften the tone.

Wednesday's statement from 40 or so leading bishops seemed to stay the course while perhaps dialing down the rhetoric a notch.

It also said that apart from trying to restart talks with the White House, the bishops would seek relief through Congress and the courts. Both of those avenues pose significant hurdles, especially since public opinion is not coalescing behind either the bishops' stand or their attempts to frame the battle as a fight to defend religious liberty.

That may explain why the Administrative Committee statement also highlighted an upcoming new campaign, to be launched with the publication of "A Statement on Religious Liberty," which will reportedly broaden the scope to include limitations on churches aiding illegal immigrants, Christian groups organizing on campuses, and churches renting space in public schools.

Another clear goal of the Administrative Committee was to project a united front in the church's campaign against the contraception rule. The bishops have openly criticized other church agencies and publications for praising the White House accommodation and for critiquing the hierarchy's rationale for its ongoing opposition.

Wednesday's statement said the bishops are "strongly unified and intensely focused," and they thank "all who have stood firmly with us in our vigorous opposition to this unjust and illegal mandate."

David Gibson is an award-winning religion journalist, author and filmmaker. He writes for Religion News Service and until recently covered the religion beat for AOL's Politics Daily. He blogs at Commonweal magazine, and has written two books on Catholic topics, the latest a biography of Pope Benedict XVI. Via RNS.

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

Related Stories


Like what you're reading? Get Sojourners E-Mail updates!

Sojourners Comment Community Covenant

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree, even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)