The Common Good

War is Still Not the Answer -- Even with Better Rules

The U.S. offensive against Fallujah, Iraq, in 2004 involved heavy use of airstrikes and artillery bombardments which destroyed some 60 mosques, as many as 10,000 buildings, and up to 6,000 civilian deaths. After the first week of a U.S.-led offensive against the Taliban in Marja, Afghanistan, news stories continue to report sustained fighting against heavy resistance. But in the combat reporting, two particular stories were illustrative of the nature of counter-insurgency war.

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Circle of Protection for a Moral Budget

A pledge by church leaders from diverse theological and political beliefs who have come together to form a Circle of Protection around programs that serve the most vulnerable in our nation and around the world.

First, unlike Fallujah, the U.S. military is operating under strict rules of engagement that sharply reduce the use of airstrikes and say that "dropping a bomb on or near a house is forbidden unless troops are in imminent danger of being overrun, or they can prove that no civilians are inside." While this increases the risk to NATO troops, it increases the safety of civilians. As one battalion commander on the ground put it, "A professional fighting force needs to assume the preponderance of risk. That's the way it should be in a counterinsurgency."

I continue to believe, as Walter Wink wrote, that "Perhaps both just-war theorists and advocates of non-violence can find common ground for attempting to restrain bellicosity in the phrase violence-reduction criteria." One of those criteria is certainly the protection of civilians, and in that light, the change from Fallujah to Marja is a welcome one.

The other side of counter-insurgency is providing aid to civilians when an area is secure. In Afghanistan, this is increasingly part of the military mission, and it is increasingly controversial. United Nations officials in Afghanistan this week criticized the NATO forces for the "militarization of humanitarian aid," as U.S. general Stanley McChrystal has "made the rapid delivery of governmental services, including education, health care and job programs, a central part of his strategy in Marja."

I continue to believe, as the letter sent by Sojourners to President Obama last fall said,

[I]t is vitally important that humanitarian and development assistance should be provided, as much as possible, by independent civilian and non-governmental organizations, both international and local

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

Related Stories


Like what you're reading? Get Sojourners E-Mail updates!

Sojourners Comment Community Covenant

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree, even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)