Skip to main content
Sojourners
faith in action for social justice
Sojourners
About
About SojournersEventsOur TeamWork With UsMediaWays to GiveInvite a SpeakerContact Us
SojoAction
OverviewTake ActionIssue AreasResourcesFaith-Rooted AdvocatesChurch Engagement
Magazine
Current IssueArchivesManage My SubscriptionWrite for Sojourners
Sections
LatestPoliticsColumnsLiving FaithArts & CultureGlobalPodcastsVideoPreaching The Word
Subscribe
MagazineRenewPreaching the WordCustomer ServiceNewsletters
Donate
Login / Register

Kids vs. Global Warming

By Jack Palmer
iMarch poster
iMarch poster
Apr 13, 2012
Share

A lawsuit that comes to a head May 11 could set a trajectory for how we legislate and mitigate against the devastating impacts of global climate change, Think Progress reports.

The suit, which has been dubbed a ‘David vs. Goliath battle,' sees a group of young adults taking on high-level government officials, states, energy companies and big businesses over their collective failure to adequately protect our planet for future generations.

Led by 17-year old Alec Loorz, the founder of Kids vs. Global Warming, organizer of the iMatter March and the author of ‘The Declaration of Independence from Fossil Fuels’, these young people filed the lawsuit a year ago, in which they argue that:

"common law requires governments to protect critical natural resources on behalf of current and future generations… [and] the government has an inherent duty to protect the atmosphere from greenhouse gas emissions, and all of us from the impacts of global climate change."

Disappointed by the apathy and lack of action at the highest levels of government and the energy industry, and pre-empting the Occupy movement by a few months, Loorz’s 2011 iMatter March announced, in the words of Thomas Jefferson, that “Every Generation Needs A New Revolution,' that the time had come “for the youngest generation to hold our leaders accountable for their actions.”

If the powers-that-be weren’t going to listen, then people needed to make more noise.

Our Children’s Trust, the organization that filed the injunction on behalf of the plaintiffs – who are all minors – have said that the preliminary injunction was filed:

“to compel federal agencies to develop a comprehensive plan to prevent further increases in U.S. carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and to force government action in reducing CO2 emissions consistent with what current scientific analysis deems necessary to halt catastrophic climate change.”

With the help of climate scientists and lawyers, Loorz and his fellow climate advocates have been working to present a compelling case that proves that the government and the energy industry have as much responsibility to future generations as they do to the present one or shareholders.

And the case is compelling enough to be causing some anxieties for the government and the high-polluting companies who the lawsuit is targeting.

According to Think Progress:

"Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Robert Wilkins ruled that the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and several California businesses could intervene against the kids, based on the argument that limiting greenhouse gas emissions would lead to a “diminution or cessation of their businesses” — in other words, jeopardize their profit margins."

These businesses are seeking to have the case dismissed, and it will be up to Judge Wilkins on May 11 to decide whether or not that will be the case.

In his article from Think Progress, Bill Becker raises a number of interesting points about the lawsuit. First, he admits embarrassment to the fact that we have reached such a stalemate in attempts to tackle climate change through the usual channels. That a group of children have been forced to bring a legal case against their elders is a sad reflection on the failures of our leaders to act decisively.

However, Becker is also encouraged by the tenacity of these young people. They are already recognizing the problems that will await them when it is their world to run, and they realize that they need to take action now. This is a lawsuit that:

Could establish the idea that protecting a global life-support system from irreparable harm is a higher priority than corporate profits.

It is a case that is seeking to break the cycle of short-term fixes and politically-expedient actions in favor of creating a long-term vision for how we can protect our country and our planet. I for one am hoping that Judge Wilkins allows the case to proceed – we may not know it, but it is in all of our interests that it does.

Jack Palmer is a communications assistant at Sojourners. Follow Jack on Twitter @JackPalmer88.

Got something to say about what you're reading? We value your feedback!

Tell Us What You Think!

We value your feedback on the articles we post. Please fill out the form below, and a member of our online publication team will receive your message. By submitting this form, you consent to your comment being featured in our Letters section. 

Please do not include any non-text characters, such as emojis or other non-standard content, into your submission.  It may cause errors in submitting the form.  Thanks!

Don't Miss a Story!

Sojourners is committed to faith and justice even in polarized times. Will you join us on the journey?
Confirm Your Email Address.
By entering your email we'll send you our newsletter each Thursday. You can unsubscribe anytime.
iMarch poster
Search Sojourners

Subscribe

Magazine Newsletters Preaching The Word
Follow on Facebook Follow on Bluesky Follow on Instagram Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Sojourners
Donate Products Editorial Policies Privacy Policy

Media

Advertising Press

Opportunities

Careers Fellowship Program

Contact

Office
408 C St. NE
Washington DC, 20002
Phone 202-328-8842
Fax 202-328-8757
Email sojourners@sojo.net
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2025