Where does the anger come from? Just guessing, but I expect it could be that some people view liberal statements as an intentional rejection of God. If more people followed Ann Coulter's line of thinking and viewed the expression ofliberal thought as mental illness, instead of just pure evil, they would start showing compassion instead of anger!
There is no Tea Party principle that would suggest any Tea Parrty follower would every support rewarding anyone, rich or poor, that is dishonest or takes advantage of others unfairly. And I have never heard of Tea Party supporters ever suggesting lower taxes for the rich people. Their suggestion is responsible spending and lower taxes FOR ALL PEOPLE.
It is the liberals, like the staff on this blog, that want to separate out the rich and poor and make special distinctions. Not true with the Tea Party. The fully understand Jesus' warning not to offer a special seat to the rich.
Equal opportunity for all, and the liberty to make your own choices.
I've not demonized anyone. If you think it shouldn't be both legal and moral to evict someone who doesn't pay rent then you should start a campaign to change the law. Singling out one individual when you don't know the facts is not what God calls us to. And if you think that an individual or corporation has no rights to purchase property and then use it for something other that it was being used for when they purchased it, well again, start your own campaign to change the world.
I don't think you will find much support for either of your ideas. But, because it is Trump you feel you can deamonize him and impune his motives.
We have laws for a reason. If you think it was unreasonable for Trump to develop that property why didn't you go raise a billion or two and purchase the property yourself. You find it very easy to make rich people the villan, especially if you disagree with some of their political views.
People use "the government" or our written laws to evict people all the time. It could be because they don't pay their rent or it could be because they wan't to use their property for other purposes. There is nothing shameful about this practice and if there was, we would change our laws.
Is there a specific reason why you are chosing to deamonize Donald Trump? I'm not familiar with the case you refer to nor do I like Trump. But to deamonize someone for using their personal property for their own purposes is just shameful.
Official rhetoric has helped fuel an escalation of tension between the United States and Iran. Do recent negotiations mark a change in direction, or just a temporary detour from the highway to military attack?
Comments
Where does the anger come from? Just guessing, but I expect it could be that some people view liberal statements as an intentional rejection of God. If more people followed Ann Coulter's line of thinking and viewed the expression ofliberal thought as mental illness, instead of just pure evil, they would start showing compassion instead of anger!
There is no Tea Party principle that would suggest any Tea Parrty follower would every support rewarding anyone, rich or poor, that is dishonest or takes advantage of others unfairly. And I have never heard of Tea Party supporters ever suggesting lower taxes for the rich people. Their suggestion is responsible spending and lower taxes FOR ALL PEOPLE.
It is the liberals, like the staff on this blog, that want to separate out the rich and poor and make special distinctions. Not true with the Tea Party. The fully understand Jesus' warning not to offer a special seat to the rich.
Equal opportunity for all, and the liberty to make your own choices.
"For the 45 percent of deportees with no criminal record, they were guilty of being in the wrong place at the wrong time."
Yes, they were in America prior to having legal authorization for being here!
Andy, you certainly have a way to present their situation from a humorous angle!
As is often the case, it is the sin we struggle with the most that we are so quick to see in others (or in conservative talk radio).
I've not demonized anyone. If you think it shouldn't be both legal and moral to evict someone who doesn't pay rent then you should start a campaign to change the law. Singling out one individual when you don't know the facts is not what God calls us to. And if you think that an individual or corporation has no rights to purchase property and then use it for something other that it was being used for when they purchased it, well again, start your own campaign to change the world.
I don't think you will find much support for either of your ideas. But, because it is Trump you feel you can deamonize him and impune his motives.
We have laws for a reason. If you think it was unreasonable for Trump to develop that property why didn't you go raise a billion or two and purchase the property yourself. You find it very easy to make rich people the villan, especially if you disagree with some of their political views.
People use "the government" or our written laws to evict people all the time. It could be because they don't pay their rent or it could be because they wan't to use their property for other purposes. There is nothing shameful about this practice and if there was, we would change our laws.
Is there a specific reason why you are chosing to deamonize Donald Trump? I'm not familiar with the case you refer to nor do I like Trump. But to deamonize someone for using their personal property for their own purposes is just shameful.
Kansas, I don't think your comments are serious and they sure aren't funny!