Obama and Cheney: Dueling Visions of America
Sojomail - May 28, 2009
We sent them food, fertilizer, factories, more than we give our own poor people, and all they pay us back with is this nuclear test.
- South Korean Lee Soon-hwan, a 30-year-old office worker, on North Korea's nuclear test Monday. (Source: The New York Times)
Obama and Cheney: Dueling Visions of America
Last week President Barack Obama and former Vice President Dick Cheney delivered back-to-back speeches on national security.
In these speeches, we witnessed a rare moment of clarity, a moral clash in the interpretation of reality, and one of the starkest contrasts in competing visions I have ever seen for the values, direction, and policies of our nation. In short, there was a choice offered to us for exactly what kind of country and people we want to be -- and what America will mean for us and for the world.
First, President Obama offered a dramatically new direction for achieving national security, after the “misguided experiment” of the Bush years. In a very powerful symbol, Obama chose the National Archives as the venue for this major address, pointing to the historic documents that are kept here -- the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the Bill of Rights -- noting that these documents are “the foundation of liberty and justice in this country, and a light that shines for all who seek freedom, fairness, equality, and dignity around the world,” and clearly suggesting that they have been violated in the policies of the U.S. over the past several years, policies that included the systematic violation of legal rights and even the use of torture.
Just minutes later, former Vice President Cheney rose to speak at the American Enterprise Institute to aggressively defend and forcefully argue for a confident continuation of those very policies, and to vigorously attack the “contrived indignation and phony moralizing” of those who have critiqued the policies of the Bush/Cheney years (which some suggest should be called the Cheney/Bush years). Even Cheney admitted the “great dividing line” that stands between these two visions of national security. Candy Crowley of CNN called the dueling speeches “a tale of two universes.” And they were.
The president began by saying that
But, he went on to say that
He spoke of the “so-called enhanced interrogation techniques” that
And, on closing the prison at Guantanamo:
Vice President Cheney, on the other hand, began and ended with 9-11 as the justification for everything that followed: “9-11 made necessary a shift of policy, aimed at a clear strategic threat ...” He defended the “enhanced interrogation” by arguing that:
And Cheney’s view of values was that
My father was a Midwestern evangelical Christian, and an Eisenhower Republican. His core values never changed, but his politics did as his party moved further and further to the right, and his children moved to embrace faith-inspired social justice. He was still alive for the election of 2004, and after a retired men’s breakfast sponsored by the Detroit church that he and my mother had started, somebody suggested that the group go hear Dick Cheney who was speaking that night in nearby Ann Arbor. That was a mistake. My dad coldly replied, “I wouldn’t go hear Dick Cheney if he was the last speaker on the planet. Dick Cheney is evil.” My father was known by everyone for his kindness and generosity, and nobody would have called him judgmental. But his judgments of people, in particular, were unusually good.
I will leave the judgment of Dick Cheney’s soul to God, who alone is in the position to render that judgment on all of us. But I will say the vision of America that Cheney offers is decidedly evil, and has helped to spread even more evil around the world. Cheney represents the dark side of America, a view of the world dominated by fear and self-righteousness—always a deadly combination. It accepts no real reflection or self-examination; the evil in the world is always external, and the threat ever present. There is only certainty, and never humility. And, when the dark side goes unchecked, what it leads to is a state of permanent warfare, which will only be won by using any means necessary, and where the ends always justify the means. At the end of his breathtaking speech, the former vice president was so full of admiration and praise for those who used “enhanced interrogation” against America’s suspected enemies that you got the impression he would happily preside over those brutal sessions himself.
But at their best, American values are different than that, and, as the new president said, we did things during the last several years with a “framework that failed to rely on our legal traditions and time-tested institutions, and that failed to use our values as a compass,” and that “too often our government made decisions based on fear rather than foresight; that all too often our government trimmed facts and evidence to fit ideological predispositions.”
A fundamental change is now being made in American policies, at which the rest of the world -- and many Americans who had despaired over the course of their country -- will breathe a deep sigh of great relief. We are seeing the beginning of the hope that healing will come to some of the damage to the world and to America that has been done by the rampage over our most important values.
The good news about these dueling moral visions of America is that the first was offered by a young new president who has a personal priority to change the image of America in the world -- to the thundering applause of an audience at the National Archives. The second was offered by an aging figure of an old and imperial view of American leadership -- rather, domination -- in the world, which he wants to defend by any means necessary, to an increasingly marginal right-wing tank with only tepid applause.
The first is now the governing vision of American foreign policy, while the second is now a politically defeated ideology. Thanks be to God!
Abortion Reduction: Certain topics in our public life have become volatile political footballs, tossed back and forth with little regard for understanding either side's perspective -- and with increasing amounts of anger. The issue of abortion likely tops the list. But as Sojourners associate editor Julie Polter writes in "Bridge Over Troubled Waters," the current conversation among pro-choice and pro-life advocates may finally yield some pragmatic fruit.
Gay Marriage: "In April, Vermont and Iowa effectively legalized gay marriage. State courts and legislatures are hotly debating a number of civil rights issues for gays and lesbians. My own interest was piqued when I heard that my home state of California passed Proposition 8, which amended the state constitution to ban same-sex marriage ...." Read the rest of Logan Laituri's commentary on gay marriage.
H'rumphs with Ed Spivey Jr: "As I sit at my desk thinking up innovative ideas for the coming decade -- MacArthur Mediocrity Grants, AIG offices relocating to Guantanamo, AIDS awareness seminars for the pope ("I don't use condoms, so why should Africa?") -- my mind wanders and I think back to the sound the newspaper didn't make this morning as it was tossed into our yard. What used to wake us with the thud of a small futon falling off the back of a truck now whistles through the air like an empty Slurpee cup, landing noiselessly ...." Read the rest of Ed's column, or better yet, watch this month's H'rumphs video!
Money "Creation": Let there be money?
Judge Sotomayor's Nomination
Blessing of the Bicycles
Saving Kansas City, One (Green) Step at a Time
Zimbabwe's Hall of Faith
What if the Bible's Ruth Came to America Today?
Liberty University's New Policy
The Human Rights Crisis in the Philippines
Native American Theology(ies)
The Poor Can Lead the Charge
Equitable Neighborhood Revitalization
Obama’s Catholic Moment
Was Iraq a Holy War?
The Consensus Problem
The End of Christianity?
Add a Spring to Life -- help the Maryknoll Sisters continue making God's Love Visible.
Are you Hungry for Justice? Start the discussion and take it to a deeper level in your church with Sojourners’ best-selling resource, Hungry for Justice. This six-week guide explores the Bible’s call to social justice and service to the poor.
Israel - Palestine - Iran - Iraq. What do you know about the Middle East? It is crucial for Christians to understand this region so they can work for a just peace. Learn more with Sojourners’ study guide, Christians and the Middle East.
What Would Jesus Buy? Find out in this feature-length DVD from Morgan Spurlock of SuperSize Me. Rev. Billy and the Church of Stop Shopping discover the meaning of the Shopocalyse -- the end of mankind from consumerism, over-consumption, and the fires of eternal debt. Learn more.
Why is the gap between the rich and poor getting wider? Trade agreements and issues of international finance affect economic equality around the world. Explore this issue with Sojourners’ study guide, Christians and Trade Justice - available immediately.
The Great Awakening: Seven Ways to Change the World -- Jim Wallis’ latest NY Times bestseller is now out in paperback. Order yours today and get a free downloadable study guide!
|GIVE TO SOJOURNERS: Donate now to support this voice for justice and peace.
GET THE MAGAZINE: Subscribe today