Various Web sites and e-mails are reporting that cancer survival rates are much higher in the U.S. than in various European countries. Some quote Mark Tapscott  in the Washington Examiner, who quotes Jim Hoft  in the American Issue Project, who quotes Michael D. Tanner  of the Cato Institute, who quotes ... well, quite a group of conservative pundits and politicians are involved. They appear to be using the same set of statistics to argue that national health care results in dramatically increased mortality rates from breast, prostate, and other cancers.
To check the facts, I went to the World Health Organization  and made myself a chart. Using the most recent statistics available, I compared the health outcomes of six Western nations. No nation's health-care program is totally private, and no program is totally nationalized. Government funds pay for a percentage of health-care expenses in all six countries: the United States (45.8 percent), Germany (76.6 percent), Italy (77.1 percent), France (79.7 percent), the Netherlands (81.8 percent), and the United Kingdom (87.4 percent).
Do mortality rates increase with a higher percentage of government funding? Here's what I found:
Personally, I don't want to die from cancer. I don't want to die from heart disease or other non-communicable diseases either, and I'd rather not be smashed to death in an accident. In fact, I'd just as soon stay healthy as long as possible, so I'd be very happy if the United States had the best health care in the world. Alas, we have a long way to go.
Of the six countries I compared, the United States is at the bottom in terms of healthy life expectancy: 69 years here compared to 71 in the Netherlands and the U.K., 72 in France and Germany, and 73 in Italy.
The U.S. is also at the bottom in terms of total life expectancy: 78 years here compared to 79 in the U.K., 80 in Germany and the Netherlands, and 81 in France and Italy.
Please, when you get an e-mail or see a Web page giving statistics to argue that the United States already has excellent health care and doesn't need to revamp the system, stop and ponder. We currently spend roughly twice as much per capita on health care (counting both public and private sources) as these European countries.
What lots of Americans don't realize is this: The U.S. government already spends more per capita on health care than do the governments of these other countries -- over 50 percent more than the Italian government spends, for example. And yet the Italians manage cancer just as well as we do, and their health-care outcomes are better than ours in every other category.
LaVonne Neff is an editor, writer, and publishing consultant in Wheaton, Illinois, who blogs on book, bodies, and belief at livelydust.blogspot.com 
To learn more about health-care reform, click here to visit Sojourners' Health-Care Resources Web page.