The Common Good

A New Way of Being 'Pro-Choice'

“I knew from the beginning that as a woman, an older woman, in a group of ministers who are accustomed to having women largely as supporters, there was no place for me to come into a leadership role. The competition wasn’t worth it.”

Naypong/Shutterstock
To be “pro-choice” is to make decisions beyond the horizon — to act for the beloved community. Naypong/Shutterstock

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Circle of Protection for a Moral Budget

A pledge by church leaders from diverse theological and political beliefs who have come together to form a Circle of Protection around programs that serve the most vulnerable in our nation and around the world.

These are the words Ella Baker spoke regarding her decision to leave the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, SCLC, in 1958. Baker was one of the core founders of this organization. Yet, her male colleagues only recognized her competence and expertise to a limit. The “preacher’s club” selected Rev. Wyatt Tee Walker to replace Baker at the helm. Due to this prevailing patriarchy and what she deemed a focus on “mass rallies and grand exhortations by ministers without follow-up,” Baker left the SCLC. She chose to go her own womanly way.

We make decisions every day. Life’s twenty-four-hour cycle is filled with choices. We contemplate what we will wear. We ponder breakfast selections. Will it be the bagel with cream cheese or a caramel macchiato with soy? Should I watch Mad Men, Scandal, or go to bed early? Do I call or just send a text or email? Our daily lives are replete with routine choices.

However, beyond these commonplace decisions are those personal, communal, and national selections that will have an impact on our lives years from now. There are the determinations that will influence us and generations to come. Just recently, Dr. Steve Perry tweeted: “The most important parenting decision could be where you send your kid to school.” Yes, right now high school seniors are toiling over college choices. A single mother is struggling with whether to take a second job at the expense of time with children. Congress is debating, actually arguing, over whether to extend unemployment benefits to a million or so recipients, many of whom are perhaps sick and tired of getting such assistance and sick and tired of being political fodder.

These are the perpetual decisions that live beyond a minute’s consideration. Such are the sprint-like choices that, in the end, have marathon consequences. While we face mundane decisions on a regular basis, there are instances in life when the opportunity to go right or left, up or down, in or out, will carry us down a road from which there is no return. Choose carefully.

In the book of Deuteronomy, God offers Moses and the children of Israel the choice of “life and prosperity or death and adversity (30:19).” Ironically, God makes the decision for them and admonishes the hearers to cast their lot with life “so that their descendants may live (v.19).” In other words, what Moses and his followers do at this intersection will influence children whom they will not live to see. The action they take at this fork in the road will set the path for their progeny.

Additionally, the Book of Ecclesiasticus, not Ecclesiastes, upholds the significance of making proper choices. This literature, sometimes referred to as “Sirach” is a part of the Apocryphal or Deuterocanoncial works prevalent in Catholicism. In Sirach or Ecclesiasticus chapter 15, the author makes note of “the power of ... free choice (v.14),” and humanity’s “choice between fire and water (v. 16).” As recorded in Deuteronomy, this book also comments that “before each person are life and death (v. 17).”

Both biblical passages offer contextual relevance in helping us see that some decisions are not mere matters of color, food, or size. Pondering “life or death” choices is just that — will what you do make life better for you and the community or will what I decide possibly bring destruction to me and my neighbor? Any “choice” words spoken in haste can kill my brother’s spirit, but choosing to employ language in love can shape a girl’s self-esteem and give her promise.

Being “pro-choice” in a revisionist way means I am “pro” choosing to do what benefits persons beyond my circle of influence. To be “pro-choice” indicates that our decisions potentially have tentacles stretching to our children’s children and their children. The idea of “pro-choice” avers that the road we take now can provide a rocky route or serve as fertile ground for generations yet born. To be “pro-choice” is to make decisions beyond the horizon — to act for the beloved community.

Standing at the crossroads and junctures of life is not solely about our individual living. These watershed challenges should lead us to consider touching people outside our physical reach.

When Ella Baker decided to leave the SCLC, she did not leave the work of civil rights. In 1960, after witnessing the power of student sit-ins, Baker formed the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee or SNCC (“Snick”). Because of the influence of SNCC, students became the face of the Freedom Rides in 1961. These Freedom Rides, from Washington, D.C. and Nashville down to Alabama, led to Freedom Summer in 1964. In the heat of the day, students led volunteers from across the nation in a massive voter registration drive throughout Mississippi. Subsequently, many students formed the Students for a Democratic Society. Today schools and centers across the country bear witness to the movement Baker initiated.

Ella Baker had a “pro-choice” moment. In that moment, she seized the opportunity and made a decision that would turn the tide of history. She chose to do what far exceeded herself. Although SNCC is no longer a viable entity, and Baker died in 1986, her name, her work, and her spirit thrive.         

I dare say that the spirit of this national mobilizer, the fight of this political activist, the labor of this community organizer still gives life to some boy, some girl who could become the next president. Go figure and choose wisely!

Does the faith community fall short of the ideals established by Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.?

About ON Scripture
Learn more about the ON Scripture Editorial Board
Like ON Scripture on Facebook
Follow ON Scripture on Twitter @OnScripture
ON Scripture – The Bible is made possible by generous grants
from the Lilly Endowment and the Henry Luce Foundation.


Photo: Naypong/Shutterstock

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

Related Stories

Resources

Like what you're reading? Get Sojourners E-Mail updates!

Sojourners Comment Community Covenant

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree, even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)