The Common Good

Jimmy Carter vs. the SBC/Driscoll/Victoria’s Secret: A Sea Change?

Jimmy Carter offered a letter a few years ago explaining why he divorced himself from the Southern Baptist Convention after six decades as a deacon and Sunday School teacher. Basically, he contended that the SBC continued to legislate gender inequity from the top-down, cherry picking select verses to serve a desired patriarchal end, to which Carter responds:

Victoria's Secret storefront. By Samantha Marx, via Flickr.com
Victoria's Secret storefront. By Samantha Marx, via Flickr.com

Related Reading

Take Action on This Issue

Circle of Protection for a Moral Budget

A pledge by church leaders from diverse theological and political beliefs who have come together to form a Circle of Protection around programs that serve the most vulnerable in our nation and around the world.

It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention’s leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be “subservient” to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service.

It’s easy, in the daily course of events, to forget how pervasive such judgments against the equality of women really are, especially as we have examples of powerful women in political office and business. But just as having a black President doesn’t solve racial inequities, neither do a handful of high-profile women indicate there isn’t an ongoing struggle for parity among millions of other women without such power.

Carter continues:

At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.

It’s safe to say that everyone from Mark Driscoll’s reformed theology cohort to the Catholic Church and even the SBC itself would stand unified in opposition to the more egregious and graphic examples of violence against women. But the more silent, insidious oppression of women through systemic roadblocks, gender bias, and sexual objectification can be just as damaging, if not more so in terms of numbers of women affected.

Consider, for example, Victoria’s Secret’s most recent “Bright Young Things” campaign, which generated a fair amount of blowback from those accusing them of sexually objectifying teens. In their own defense, they contended their focus was on college students, but the problem remains with that third little word in the title of the campaign:

Things.

Sojourners rightly shot back against this part of the campaign, and since then, they have started a photo album on Facebook of girls in various settings, with titles like “Bright Young Scholar,” or “Bright Young Athlete.” It’s a start, but the very fact that we’re still having such conversations a dozen-plus years into the twenty-first century shows just how far we still have to go.

Carter continues in his letter, drawing a wider societal circle within which so many of us fall:

The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in the West. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.

It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and outdated attitudes and practices — as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.

As they say in 12-step groups, the first step toward recovery is admitting you have a problem. Kudos to President Carter and the likes of Sojourners for pulling the veil back to reveal the ongoing sickness that lies beneath. Yes, we will continue to have our Mark Driscolls and our Southern Baptist Conventions who claim a Biblical basis for the systemic oppression of half the world’s population. But the power isn’t as much in their actions or words as the power we give them.

Consider the trends in social attitudes toward smoking. It used to be everywhere, and no one thought twice about smoking in a restaurant or in a car with children. Today people still smoke, but they face a growing swell of negative public opinion that has affected not only the places in which it’s considered acceptable to smoke, but it has also arguably been the tipping point leading to many quitting all together.

The first step toward seeing the objectification, other-ization and suppression of women is recognizing the problem still exists. From there, we have to be diligent in our counter-measures to deem such attitudes as outside the acceptable social norm. With persistence and some time, this tide which has begun to turn will be irreversibly altered for the better.

Sign the petition now! Tell Limited Brands and Victoria’s Secret their value of making money is not worth exploiting the sacred value of women and girls

Editor's Note: A previous version of this piece indicated that Carter's statements were "recent." This version indicates the correct timeframe. 

Christian Piatt is an author, editor, speaker, musician and spoken word artist. He co-founded Milagro Christian Church in Pueblo, Colorado with his wife, Rev. Amy Piatt, in 2004. Christian is the creator and editor of "Banned Questions About The Bible" and "Banned Questions About Jesus." His new memoir on faith, family and parenting is called "PREGMANCY: A Dad, a Little Dude and a Due Date."

Photo: Victoria's Secret storefront. By Samantha Marx, via Flickr.com

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

Related Stories

Resources

Like what you're reading? Get Sojourners E-Mail updates!

Sojourners Comment Community Covenant

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree, even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)