The Common Good

Middle East Riots Fueled by Competition Between Radicals, Moderates

Anti-American protesters in Srinagar, the summer capital of Indian administered Kashmir, India., on Sept. 14, 2012.

Anti-American riots that have spread to more than a dozen countries across the Middle East are a sign of fissures between radical and more moderate Islamists that are vying for power as their societies undergo change, Middle East experts say.

Whether U.S. foreign policy has helped create a political environment where radicals are struggling to remain relevant, or emboldened extremists to act out, is a matter of disagreement.
 
President Obama's approach to the Arab Spring, to engage with the Islamists and not the secularists, "is seen by our foes as disengagement, while the radicals are not backing off," said Walid Phares, an adviser to the Anti-Terrorism Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives and author of the 2010 book The Coming Revolution: Struggle for Freedom in the Middle East.

"When we withdraw, they advance."
 
Tamara Wittes, who served as deputy assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs until a few months ago, sees it differently.
 
The U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq removed "a massive source" of grievance for ultra-conservative Muslims, called Salafis, who have been leading the charge in the recent protests and who are ideologically close to Islamic terrorists who have warred with the U.S., Wittes said. "Now they're left trying to gin up anti-American feelings over this campy movie. If Salafi groups are left having to troll the Internet for a pretext, I think we're in pretty good shape."
 
Demonstrators have attacked U.S. embassies and fought battles with government security forces, expressing their anger at a 14-minute YouTube trailer for a film produced in Los Angeles that portrays Islam's prophet, Muhammad, as a womanizer and a fraud.
 
Wittes said the U.S. has become a convenient political football in a struggle for power in the Arab world that was set in motion by the democratic openness that President Obama and former president George W. Bush have tried to usher into the region.
 
With democratic governments now in Iraq, Egypt, Tunisia and Libya, and a new government in Yemen, "power has opened up and there's an argument in these countries about what kind of society they're going to be," she said.
 
The Salafis want to compel people to live in a way that emulates the life of Muhammad and his followers and want to prevent an open society with a range of political views, Wittes said. "There are others competing on the other side."
 
Salafi leaders are using the opportunity to gain followers and influence at the expense of the more moderate Muslim Brotherhood, which until now has been the greatest political beneficiary of the uprisings that have shaken the Arab world during the past two years, Phares said.
 
The ultra-conservative Salafis who have whipped up public sentiments over the video are sincerely angry, but the demonstrations are also "a way to stick a finger in the eye of the current government," Wittes said.
 
Kori Schake, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution who teaches at West Point, said the unrest is being promoted by radical Islamist leaders who have lost popularity across the Arab world since the 9/11 attacks and are trying to remain relevant.
 
In the Arab world, the 9/11 attacks weakened radicals and violent extremists who had argued that the political process could not solve their problems, and gave rise to more moderate Islamists in places like Turkey, Jordan and Iraq, where the Sunni Awakening supplanted al-Qaida in Iraq, Schake said.
 
In Egypt, Islamists who won a collective landslide in the elections have since lost popularity as the economy continues to founder, she said.
 
Schake said Obama and other U.S. leaders should be more visible in the Middle East and focus more on economic development and improving governance, which will help Arab nations address their citizens' political dissatisfaction.
 
"Help them create economic activities that we believe everywhere else in the world is the solution to problems that create instability," Schake said. "Democratic governance is the solution to these problems. It's rocky in the transition, but in the long run it is the only way to secure what we are seeking -- politically moderate societies that solve their own problems."

Oren Dorell writes for USA Today. Via RNS.

Photo credit: Kashmiri Muslims shout anti-American and anti-Israeli slogans during a protest against the anti-Islam film on September 14, 2012 in Srinagar, the summer capital of Indian administered Kashmir, India. Various religious and resistance groups called for peaceful protests against the film 'Innocence of Islam,' that has already led to violent protests in Libya, Egypt and Yemen. (Photo by Yawar Nazir/Getty Images)

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

Related Stories

Resources

Like what you're reading? Get Sojourners E-Mail updates!

Sojourners Comment Community Covenant

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree, even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)